Fetal MR MoCo
ISMRM Workshop on Motion Correction in MR 2024
Session 5: Retrospective Correction
Unveiling the Fetus: Correcting Motion in Fetal MRI
Joshua van Amerom
SickKids Research Institute
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Canada
Highlights
- fetal MRI enhances prenatal diagnosis, but is hindered by fetal motion
- motion in fetal MRI can be overcome by the combination of prospective techniques (e.g., fast acquisitions) with retrospective motion correction strategies (e.g., data-driven cardiac gating, slice-to-volume reconstruction)
- slice-to-volume reconstruction is widely used in fetal MRI to integrate multiple 2D slices into a high-quality 3D volume, improving imaging for fetal brain, body, and heart
Syllabus
MRI can provide a unique view of the developing fetus in utero. As an adjunct to ultrasound, fetal MR can provide images that can aid in prenatal diagnosis, improving outcomes by impacting in utero management, delivery planning and postnatal status. In addition, studies utilizing MR and the novel information it can provide contribute to understanding of normal and pathological development.
There are many challenges to capturing a fetus in the in utero setting with MRI, including aliasing and other artifacts, adequate signal and resolution, and safety limitations on scanner performance [Dighe2022; Gholipour2015]. However, the most ubiquitous challenge in fetal MRI is motion.
Displacement and deformation of fetal anatomy occurs due both maternal and fetal movement. Maternal breathing can have a continuous impact on the fetal anatomy depending on diaphragm movement and fetal position. Contractions and other episodic movements may also occur. Most fetal motion is unpredictable, such as bulk and limb movements, breathing movements in preparation for postnatal respiration, swallowing, hiccups, yawning, mouthing. Fetal motion, such as cardiac pulsation, occurs consistently. The combination of all these movements leads to changing fetal position and pose, and image artifact [Malamateniou2013; Stout2021].
Methods to prevent, reduce and compensate for motion in fetal MRI include many familiar from postnatal MR, as well as some unique to the subject. Prospective methods include patient preparation, timing of the scan, breath-holding, the use of fast and motion robust acquisitions, gating to external signals, and scan-time FOV adjustments and quality control [Malamateniou2013; Uus2022]. However, this talk will focus largely on retrospective techniques.
Methods for retrospective motion correction in fetal MR include:
- data-driven motion estimation and cardiac gating
- motion compensation strategies, such as outlier rejection and binning
- artifact correction
- k-space motion corrected MR image reconstruction
- image space motion correction in serial images
- slice-to-volume reconstruction
Slice-to-volume reconstruction (SVR) provides a unique solution to fetal motion via motion corrected and compensated volumetric synthesis from many different views of the fetal anatomy of interest [Ebner2020; Jiang2007; Gholipour2010; Kuklisova-Murgasova2012; Rousseau2006]. In this way, SVR creates a self-consistent 3D volume from inconsistent 2D slices. With automated motion correction and outlier rejection, the acquisition of data for SVR can simply the MR exam, replacing a manual prescribe-scan-review-repeat approach in search of motion-free views of desired cross sections of the anatomy of interest in ideal cross section. SVR has been most widely used to generate high quality volumetric images of the fetal brain from single shot fast spin echo images and has also been applied to fetal body and the heart using the same acquisition sequence [Uus2022]. There are also implementations extending the SVR technique to diffusion and functional imaging, parameter mapping, and time-resolved cardiac imaging and blood flow quantification [Calixto2024; Christiaens2019; Roy2019; Goolaub2021; Roberts2020; Uus2022]. Deep learning models for SVR and related techniques have been developed that shift computational burden from inference to training, allowing for faster, fully automated reconstruction [Calixto2024; Meshaka2022; Uus2022].
References
[Calixto2024] Calixto C, Taymourtash A, Karimi D, Snoussi H, Velasco-Annis C, Jaimes C, Gholipour A. Advances in Fetal Brain Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2024;32(3):459–78. DOI: 10.1016/J.MRIC.2024.03.004
[Christiaens2019] Christiaens D, Slator PJ, Cordero-Grande L, Price AN, Deprez M, Alexander DC, Rutherford M, Hajnal J V., Hutter J. In Utero Diffusion MRI: Challenges, Advances, and Applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;28(5):255–64. DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000211
[Dighe2022] Dighe M, Turk EA. Fetal and placental imaging. In: Motion Correction in MR - Correction of Position Motion and Dynamic Field Changes. 1st ed. Elsevier Inc.; 2022. p. 519–31. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824460-9.00031-5
[Ebner2020] Ebner M, Wang G, Li W, Aertsen M, Patel PA, Aughwane R, Melbourne A, Doel T, Dymarkowski S, De Coppi P, David AL, Deprest J, Ourselin S, Vercauteren T. An automated framework for localization, segmentation and super-resolution reconstruction of fetal brain MRI. Neuroimage. 2020;206:116324. DOI: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2019.116324
[Gholipour2010] Gholipour A, Estroff J a, Warfield SK. Robust super-resolution volume reconstruction from slice acquisitions: application to fetal brain MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(10):1739–58. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2051680
[Gholipour2015] Gholipour A, Estroff JA, Barnewolt CE, Robertson RL, Grant PE, Gagoski B, Warfield SK, Afacan O, Connolly SA, Neil JJ, Wolfberg A, Mulkern R V. Fetal MRI: A technical update with educational aspirations. Concepts Magn Reson Part A. 2015; DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.21321
[Goolaub2021] Goolaub DS, Xu J, Schrauben E, Sun L, Roy CW, Marini D, Seed M, Macgowan CK. Fetal Flow Quantification in Great Vessels Using Motion-Corrected Radial Phase Contrast MRI: Comparison With Cartesian. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53(2):540–51. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27334
[Jiang2007] Jiang S, Xue H, Glover A, Rutherford M, Rueckert D, Hajnal J V. MRI of moving subjects using multislice Snapshot images with Volume Reconstruction (SVR): Application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007;26(7):967–80.
[Kuklisova-Murgasova2012] Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Quaghebeur G, Rutherford MA, Hajnal J V., Schnabel JA. Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal. Med Image Anal. 2012;16(8):1550–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004
[Malamateniou2013] Malamateniou C, Malik SJ, Counsell SJ, Allsop JM, McGuinness a K, Hayat T, Broadhouse K, Nunes RG, Ederies a M, Hajnal J V, Rutherford M a. Motion-compensation techniques in neonatal and fetal MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(6):1124–36. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3128
[Meshaka2022] Meshaka R, Gaunt T, Shelmerdine SC. Artificial intelligence applied to fetal MRI: A scoping review of current research. Br J Radiol. 2022; DOI: 10.1259/BJR.20211205
[Roberts2020] Roberts TA, van Amerom JFP, Uus A, Lloyd DFA, van Poppel MPM, Price AN, Tournier JD, Mohanadass CA, Jackson LH, Malik SJ, Pushparajah K, Rutherford MA, Rezavi R, Deprez M, Hajnal J V. Fetal whole heart blood flow imaging using 4D cine MRI. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4992. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18790-1
[Rousseau2006] Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Iordanova B, Rodriguez-Carranza C, Vigneron DB, Barkovich JA, Studholme C. Registration-based approach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero fetal MR brain images. Acad Radiol. 2006;13(9):1072–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.05.003
[Roy2019] Roy CW, van Amerom JFP, Marini D, Seed M, Macgowan CK. Fetal Cardiac MRI: A Review of Technical Advancements. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;28(5):235–44. DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000218
[Stout2021] Stout JN, Bedoya MA, Grant PE, Estroff JA. Fetal Neuroimaging Updates. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2021;29(4):557–81. DOI: 10.1016/J.MRIC.2021.06.007
[Uus2022] Uus AU, Collado AE, Roberts TA, Hajnal J V., Rutherford MA, Deprez M. Retrospective motion correction in fetal MRI for clinical applications: existing methods, applications and integration into clinical practice. Br J Radiol. 2022; DOI: 10.1259/BJR.20220071